![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKy70DFK2KP5UjFrC9XJC6jwl0MFs22XMTM0yoxv0fe-ChZJglMmXZW_OQavqlPOdPVot_nmPoP1GcIoDZZK9YJKjnNvFzDcZh1rCjNMBti_7VnZ1XKDDKF0YSLNMPErQEZSw1iIRTjOg/s320/Grand+Canyon.jpg)
When I asked Dr. Anne Goldstein of the L.U.A. her professional opinion of the canyon she just shrugged her shoulders and said, “it’s alright, I guess.”
“If you look at rocks and stuff from a scientific viewpoint you’ll understand that this canyon had literally millions and millions of years of erosion, tectonic shifting and upheavals to form. Viewed through that lens, you’d expect something with a little more pizazz”, said Dr. Goldstein in her concluding remarks.
The report sent shock waves through the National Parks organization who lauded the scientific efforts of the team but officially denied any knowledge of any wrongdoing in the naming of the canyon and formally disagreed with the panel. “We think it’s a fantastic canyon. In fact its one of our best”, exclaimed David Billings of the National Parks Administration. “Nevertheless, we’re working to provide the public with some of the finest canyons, forests and mountains anywhere on earth and we’re committed to that. I think 2010 is going to be a banner year for canyons in general and, most likely, next summer will be the premier of something special we've been working on..” Billings declined to elaborate but the term “Supercanyon” has been heard. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
No comments:
Post a Comment